2018 Movie Midterms, Pt. 2

More Movies!  More Marvel!  More Monkeyshines!

(HERE for PART 1)

Rampage:  A two hour movie about that video game you sort of remember playing a few times in the late 80s starring that cuddly mound of man meat Dwayne Johnson, the new Ms. Moneypenny, and The Comedian as Neegan as an FBI guy who everyone, himself included, keeps referring to as a “cowboy” for some reason.  A giant albino gorilla, a gianter flying wolf, and a giantest spiked alligator go nuts and destroy Chicago.  But the giant ape turns good again and saves the day.  Then he gives The Rock the finger.  And there are lots of helicopters.  And Joe Manganiello as “growling guy.”  And a cameo appearance by the eponymous video game, not quite so surreptitiously placed behind Malin Akerman and her annoying brother and their pet rat.  It’s soooo dummmb.  

I dug it.

Super Troopers 2: Here’s the thing- I never saw the first Super Troopers.  But I dove in anyway, and I’m glad I did because this movie is all the right kinds of STOOOOOOPID.  Seriously, I had a blast.  Check that brain at the door and just laugh at these five idiots being idiots for 90 minutes.

Avengers: Infinity War: Spoiler Alert: your favorite new Marvel superhero probably dies in this movie.  But don’t fret- all the unoriginal buzzkill critic jerknozzles will fall all over themselves to reassure you that your hero will be back because the actor portraying him or her has a three movie deal!  No, no, please, people who get paid too much money to write about movies, why don’t you all gloss over the artistically uncomfortable, totally earned, emotional final moments of this film so you can push your glasses up higher on the bridge of your nose and, in your best Steve Urkel voice, declare, “the impact of the finale is lessened by the knowledge that there are sequels coming out starring these people,” like the world’s most obvious fucking know-it-all party pooper.  Seriously, you’re SO SMART, pumpkin.  You’re Mommy’s favorite little smarty-smart.

Anyway, this movie is a nonstop thrill ride with a poignant downbeat ending, and it’s really great.  

And Peter Dinklage plays a giant dwarf, sooooo… totally worth it.

Deadpool 2: the best thing about DP2?  They didn’t try to one-up Deadpool.  They just made another movie.  Sure, there are more characters, subplots, and action sequences, but they never feel like the filmmakers trying to top themselves.  This ain’t no The Matrix: Reloaded (need to say it- I absolutely love the Matrix sequels in all their over-the-top glory.  This was just an example, because you know what I mean when I say, “this ain’t no The Matrix: Reloaded” in the context of a movie trying to one-up its predecessor.  Right?  Good.  Now where was I?)- it’s a movie that is comfortable with its grounded approach to maintaining the world built in the first flick.  Because it’s all about the funny, and if you start to get all flashy with whizbang SFX and big, multi-character battles against hordes of evil, you might lose the funny in an effectively personal story like this.  AND, as it turns out, keeping it small(-ish) actually helps to punctuate the emotional, heartfelt stuff as well.

Also, I could listen to that Dopinder guy scream like a girl ALL DAY.

Solo: A Star Wars Story: “…a total blast that felt more like OG Star Wars than literally ANYTHING that has come out since Endor hosted The Great Teddy Bear Rave of ’83.”

WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love Dinosaur Movies Again: I mean, does it make me a bad person if I actually liked this movie?  Because I actually liked this movie.  Quite a bit.  Yeah, the first 15 minutes or so were chock full of bad dialogue, embarrassingly obvious foreshadowing, and plot points that got holes shot in them right away… but later I kind of forgot the specifics about those things because I was too busy BEING ENTERTAINED.  So sue me.

Look, it’s the fifth movie in a franchise that should have ended after the first.  An unnecessary sequel to a soft reboot that nobody asked for.  I mean, how many goddamn times can you make a movie about the failure to keep cloned dinosaurs locked up without treading over the same cinematic ground?  It’s clear that they know this.  So they went ahead and changed things up a bit by smartening up the action and dumbing down the stakes.  And what we got was an honest-to-god, old-school, exciting summer blockbuster action extravaganza that actually felt more Spielberg-y than original sequel The Lost World ever did. 

So, thanks, J. A. Bayona, Chris Pratt, Michael Giacchino, et al., for reaching down deep, finding and defibrillating high school me, and getting him excited about big, loud movies again for a couple of hours.  Life, uhhh… found a way, and stuff.

And yes- I did just use “et al.” incorrectly, thank you very much.

Ant-Man and the Wasp: well, that was a nice palate-cleanser.  The stakes are low, the action is (ahem) small, and the story is completely self-contained, in the grand Marvel scheme of things.  After Infinity War’s super-seriousness, I welcome all that.  The only issue is that I couldn’t help but keep the aforementioned Avengers flick on deck in my brain, simply because it has such all-encompassing ramifications to these MCU movies, and I was constantly considering where AM&TW fits into it all.  But the mid-credits stinger dealt with it, so… all good.

Paul Rudd, while maybe not a Shakespeare-level actor, is an unendingly likable guy, and everyone else on-screen really responds to that.  And that camaraderie really helps to sell the multiple themes of family that Peyton Reed peppers throughout this thing.  The scenes with Scott Lang and his daughter are particularly sweet, which is a nice change of pace for Marvel; after the heavily dysfunctional familial overtones of GOTG2, Infinity War, all the Thor flicks, etc., it’s refreshing to have a simple, relatively uncomplicated family thing to keep a movie grounded in feel-goodland while the title characters are off shrinking, growing, heisting, punching, kicking, and science-ing.*

I don’t really see a compelling reason for them to make a third Ant-Man movie, though.  This is the second time they’ve followed up a big, all-encompassing, multi-hero, Marvel Universe-changing flick with a safe little Ant sorbet, which probably means there’s not much more you can do with this guy.  Really, they should just have these characters cameo in other people’s movies- Wasp should definitely show up in Black Widow’s solo joint, if that ever happens, and if a non-Evans Cap happens, Ant-Man should definitely be a part of it.  And Hank Pym is already basically nu-Selvig, so let him be part of whatever SHIELD-like Avengers home base thing they’ve got going on.  This way we can avoid more action scenes revolving around what new child’s toy they can accidentally make life-sized.

I mean, sure, the giant kids’ toy thing was fun.  Twice.  A third time, though?

So, that’s where I’m at.  I got a little behind and missed a few relatively recent releases that I meant to see (Hotel Artemis, Hereditary, Incredibles 2, Tag, The First Purge), but I’ll get to them eventually and check back in with y’all.  And by “y’all” I mean all five of you.

Say goodbye, George…

george

*Did I use that semicolon correctly?  I tend to unapologetically bend the English language to my own will, but every once in a while I’m curious about proper syntax.

 


My 2017 In Movies, Part 1

Hi.  I saw some movies.

Split:  M. Night (don’t squeeze the)Shyamalan verrrry sneakily goes back to the well and successfully brings about his own career resurgence.  You probably know why by now, but in case you don’t, I’ll spoil it for you- turns out this movie is a sequel-of-sorts to Unbreakable (his best movie to date, if you asked me my opinion, which you didn’t.  Then again, you’re here, so you kinda did…).  But it’s not really a sequel until literally the absolute last shot of the movie, so let’s not dwell.  Especially since the movie we get before that reveal is really great on its own.

So, James McAvoy is a man with multiple personalities that abducts three young women.  The strongest… four (?) of these personalities manifest themselves at different times during the film, adding to the mental trauma of our captives, who, in turn, have their own strong personality differences that keep them from figuring out just what to do.  But survivor-girl has a traumatic past that may just give her an edge over McAvoy and the threat of a yet-unseen, murderous, monstrous personality that is on its way.  Also, Betty Buckley plays his shrink.

McAvoy is absolutely fantastic.  He’s usually great when playing just one role, and in this he gets to play several.  And they’re all so completely specific.  Split is proof that this guy is an actor’s actor, and while he’s been working pretty steadily for the past decade or so, I really hope he can leave the mediocre X-Men movies behind and get back to more substantial stuff like this.

Anyway, Split is great.  See it.

John Wick: Chapter 2: Hey, more highly stylized, supercrazy merc action featuring many, many fatal head wounds!  Yeah, I’m down with this whole John Wick thing and I hope they make it a trilogy.  That said, this one was slightly less fun than its predecessor… maybe because since it was a sequel it wasn’t as fresh and original?  Whatever.  Doesn’t matter.  It’s still about an underground-yet-in-plain-sight society of people killing other people quickly and brutally.  Keanu is clearly still having a blast, and that’s really all I need.  If you haven’t seen John Wick (the first one), do so, posthaste.  If you have but you skipped this one… well, you’re probably OK, if I’m being honest… but why wouldn’t you give this one a go?  It’s not like it’s asking you to postulate on the interspatial implications of thermodynamic equilibrium.  It’s just guns and punching and cars and stuff.

(uh… are the interspatial implications of thermodynamic equilibrium something one can postulate on?  Because, clearly, I pulled that one out of my butt.)

(Why, yes, my butt is where I store big words.  SO?)

The Great Wall:  Uh…lots of controversy surrounding this one, mostly of the “another movie where a white guy saves a non-white country” variety.  Turns out that’s not at all what happens.  I know this because I actually saw the movie.  And while it is told through Matt Damon’s character’s point of view, it’s so much more about the far-superior heroism of these Chinese warriors at the wall.

But none of that matters, really, because this movie is fucking dumb.

Uhhh… The end.

No, seriously, The Great Wall exists so that you can see color-specific costumed warriors going about their color-specific battle duties on top of a CGI recreation of the Great Wall of China.  Example: the blue warriors attach their feet to bungie cords and jump down into the fray so they can maybe spear an enemy or two before they get horribly mauled to death by five more baddies.  Which is completely counterintuitive- throw the damned spear from the top of the wall and maybe save a life or two instead of using a seriously convoluted method where your blue-clad ladies awkwardly bounce twenty feet below in the middle of a raging sea of razor-clawed dragon lizards.  I mean, hell- you’ve got the red-clad archers firing away already, so… oh.  Sorry.  I forgot to mention something important…

They’re not fighting Mongols.  They’re fighting giant, dragon-esque lizard creatures.  You see, these lizard creatures are sort of like locusts in that every sixty years, hordes of them come running towards the wall because there needed to be some kind of simplistic fantasy plot for this movie because I guess someone thought dragon lizards were supercool and wouldn’t it be neat if humans clad in basic vibrant colors so everyone remembers their job I guess were to fight the monsters because fantasy is so hot right now and why am I even still typing I need a drink oh god what is reality anymore and does anyone else hear the screaming or is it just in my head oh god please someone stop the screaming STOP THE SCREAMING.

Get Out:  Jordan Peele delivers a 100-minute, completely original, racially charged, reality-bending thriller that would make Rod Serling blush.  I don’t really want to say any more, in case anyone reading this hasn’t seen it (and hasn’t heard any specifics) yet.  Just know that I can’t imagine a world in which anyone watching this would be disappointed.  I’ll have to think about it a bit (and there’s still more flicks to see), but it may just be the best movie of the year.

Logan:  FINALLY.  Finally, someone let Wolverine off his leash.  I thought The Wolverine was pretty great, but it still had that “20th Century FOX superhero” sheen to it (I wrote abut it a few years back somewhere in THIS post).  This movie, though… this movie pulls out the stopper.  Opens the floodgates.  Takes off the training wheels?  No, wait… goes into berserker mode.  Whatever.  I’m off track.

I guess the future setting allowed them to do whatever they wanted, since nothing that happens in this movie could have an effect on their precious X-Man continu… it… y.  Pfff.  Too late to think about such things, FOX.  We’ve seen all those movies.  Where was I?  Right- the future.  It’s the future and old man Wolverine is living a boring life as a caretaker to the only guy who ever truly believed in him- Professor Jean-Luc Picard Xavier.  The Professor is going senile and needs medication to keep his seizures in check so he doesn’t kill everyone around him with his brain.  But Logan, who, incidentally, doesn’t quite insta-heal like he used to, crosses paths with a new mutant, smuggled out of the facility where she was created (mutants aren’t born anymore and are basically going extinct), and she, Wolvie, and Jean-Luc flee towards a (possibly fictional) mutant safe-zone while being hunted by some baddies as they trek (heh) across the country.

And what we get is an uncomfortable, brutal, and at times profound movie about generations, age, aging, fatherhood, sonhood (?), responsibility, and redemption, that, in its storytelling, isn’t afraid to get its hands dirty.  And bloody.  At times it’s similar to Unforgiven.  Other times, it reminded me of something like A Perfect World.  Part road-movie, part western, I guess.  But all great.  And in the end, it’s a perfect send-off to the role that made Hugh Jackman’s career (and, arguably, shackled him ever-so-slightly).  As far as I know he’s now done playing Wolverine, and as much as he totally owned it over the past 17 years (ho. ly. SHIT.), I’m glad he’s gone out on a film where they finally found the perfect balance between sarcasm, anger, kindness, and pathos that this character has always been about.

And, bonus!- if you only have a cursory knowledge of Wolverine (et al.) and/or have only seen a few (or none) of the other X-Movies, this one is self-contained enough for you to still enjoy.  So, enjoy!

Kong: Skull Island: “It’s OK.  Good monster fights.  Mostly lame characters.  Bad music cue decisions.  Gorgeous visuals.  Really great title character.”

(Click HERE for more.)

T2 Trainspotting: Pleasantly surprised by this movie.  And I shouldn’t have been- I should have just trusted Danny Boyle to not just lazily rehash what we’d seen before, but hey, like the characters in T2, I’m in my 40s and am naturally cynical due to the ever-creeping specter of anxiety/depression and an obligatory sense of my own mortality.

And I think maybe that’s the best way to describe T2 Trainspotting.  Those optimistic, fearless, piss-and-vinegar twentysomethings have grown up and are each dealing with their own mid-life crises.  When they get back together, all of their shared unfinished business comes out and nostalgia (for lack of a better term) gives them a quick jolt of youth, but it’s fleeting.  They still need to come to terms with who they are now.

And this is masterfully represented in the film’s direction, pacing, story, cinematography, soundtrack… literally every aspect that made the original Trainspotting such a product of mid-90s twentysomething optimism has been tweaked for mid-10s fortysomething decline.  It’s uncomfortable and it’s off-putting.  It’s pretty great.

Side note- I’m writing this brief T2 thing upon returning from a specialist who has diagnosed my sudden, intense phantom throat pain as a combination of years of reflux damage, unchecked TMJ, and horrible, horrible snoring.  BECAUSE, AGING.  Yeah, this movie hits home, hard.  All you twentysomethings out there- be afraid.  Be very afraid.

Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 2: Yeah… couldn’t leave you with that last sentence, so let’s end this first part on a positive.  Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 2 is wonderful.  Funny, irreverent, cute as hell, full of heart, packed to the gills with great music… it’s a grand old time.  Don’t listen to the people calling this movie “derivative”- just because they saved the day in GOTG doesn’t mean they’re all suddenly new characters that don’t fall back on their bad habits and personalities.  Don’t listen to the people who call this movie “hollow”- those same people complain that the Marvel movies have become “too serious.”  Don’t listen to the people calling this movie “obvious”- guaranteed, they’re complaining about the convoluted plots of other comic book flicks.  Some people are just too cool for school.

But I’m not.  A sentient baby tree that dances around to ELO while a violent monster battle rages, out of focus, in the background?  I’ll take it.  A wisecracking, humanesque weaponsmith raccoon bonding with an angry blue-skinned outcast mercenary with a heart of gold?  Yeah, I’m down.  A tattooed hunk of man-meat repeatedly insulting a lovable bug-woman through an utter lack of self-awareness?  More, please.  Is the plot a little thin?  Yeah, sure.  Is the father(s)-son conflict a little muddy right up until the moment they smack you in the face with it?  Yup.  Is the general concept of family one step over the conspicuous line?  Two steps, and yes.  Does that mean the movie isn’t a joy to watch?  Fuck no.  I am Groot.

152d7f2dfe5f971c40d5b33da3a8422c06ea21cf

Stay tuned…

(Part 2 HERE, Part 3 HERE, Part 4 HERE.)


Anthology Day

Two for the road…

V/H/S/2: I reeeeeeally didn’t like V/H/S.  It was a movie that treated its premise like the thin means to an end that it was, the stories all felt too long, even though they were only like 20 minutes each, and the annoying-as-hell characters grated on me so much that I didn’t even enjoy it when they died horribly.  Then they announced V/H/S/2, and I thought, “oh, Lord, why?”  Then some buzz was coming out of it saying it managed to fix all of the issues from the first movie.  I was skeptical, at best.

Then I watched it.

No, it didn’t fix all of the issues, but it was really, really good, you guys.

Yeah, the premise is still a little silly.  I mean, again… WHY VHS TAPES?!?!?!?  This stuff still takes place in modern-day, so who’s taking digital photography and transferring it to VHS?  Now, if these stories were vintage, like happening in the early 90’s or before, it would make sense.  But since these days it’s literally easier to make a friggin’ .m4v file and throw it onto a thumb drive than to put it on a 30-year-old piece of technology, in real time, it sort of makes me mad.  Because it means they did it so they could continue to keep the V/H/S naming convention for both movies.  No deeper reason.

Also, some of the segments are mysteriously edited together in such a way that wouldn’t really be possible.  The “Safe Haven” story, in particular.  The basic premise is that a film crew has been granted permission to enter this Indonesian cult’s compound to make a documentary on them.  They have several cameras to film with, some handheld, some on tripods, and a secret spy camera embedded in a shirt button.  Needless to say, as this is a horror movie, things go supernaturally south, and it ends bloodily for everyone involved.  It’s a really good piece of storytelling, to be sure, but at one point I started thinking to myself, “wait… how are they editing this stuff together, complete with shots from the in-house security system and footage from cameras that get destroyed in all the chaos?  And who did the editing?  And why would they edit it like a horror movie?”*

OK, that said, I want to reiterate- it was an awesome story, well-shot, well-written, suspenseful, unpredictable, and scary.  As are pretty much all of the stories in this sequel.  The issue is that it’s shackled by the main premise/framing story of the movie.**  And I don’t think I’m nitpicking or thinking too much about it.  In Creepshow, it’s a kid reading a comic book and we get to see the stories come to live-action life.  That makes sense.  That worksThese movies, though, set themselves up for scrutiny by being so specific in premise for the sake of a catchy title.

Anyway, I’ve spent all this time talking about what’s wrong with V/H/S/2 when there’s so much right about it.  Although… I suppose pointing out the negative is a direct result of how good the movie is, overall.  Because in something good, it’s always that one bad thing that sticks out like a sore thumb.***  But there’s some borderline masterful horror filmmaking going on here, even if some of the stories themselves are a little basic-horror-trope-y (zombies, angry spirits, possession, aliens).  And considering the short-filminess of it all, I’m going to call it a win for everyone involved.  If you’ve got 90-minutes to build tension and pay it off in a single story, that’s one thing, but to do it for 20-30 minutes at a time, 5 times in a row, and not lose me like your predecessor did?  Bravo.

vhs2

*I’m skirting spoiler territory here, but trust me, it doesn’t matter.  What happens to everyone in the end is not half as cool as how it gets there.

**Need to say this, too- as dumb as the whole VHS premise is, the framing story this time around was really, really well done.  Creepy and scary as hell.

***Example (not the best one, but it’s the one that just popped up in my head): Poltergeist.  GREAT movie, all-around.  But that one bit where the guy peels off his face always sticks out because it looks crappy.  Does it ruin the movie?  Hells no.  But you sure do notice it when you watch…

Movie 43: Whoa.  I just went to Wikipedia for a quick refresher on Movie 43’s cast and stories (it’s been over a month since I watched it), and learned it was overwhelmingly panned by critics, and that some of the actors in it tried to get out of their contracts during filming.  I’m curious as to why.  Because I gotta say- I started it up on Netflix thinking I’d see something kind of funny that I could turn off at any time, should it suck, and instead actually laughed my ass off, many times, alone in my living room, and would have been fine if the movie had presented me with several more mini-stories.  Maybe I’m too easy, or something.

OK, let’s back up for a minute.  In case you don’t know, Movie 43 is a comedy anthology movie starring… lots of people.  From Hugh Jackman to Anna Faris to Johnny Knoxville to Kate Winslet.  I think that’s a good cross-section of the varietal casting involved here.  The directors range from Brett Ratner to James Gunn to Elizabeth Banks to Peter Farrelly.  So, it’s all over the place, talent-wise.  It’s usually compared, stylistically, to Kentucky Fried Movie, if you’ve ever seen that.  If not, maybe Amazon Women On The MoonThe Groove Tube?  No?  See those, you guys.

Anyway, yeah, comedy anthology.  The framing story stars Dennis Quaid as a crazy screenwriter who tries to pitch a movie to Greg Kinnear.  Each story is a new scene in his, “movie,” and each one makes Kinnear more certain that Quaid has lost his mind.  Eventually, Kinnear gives up on trying to be magnanimous about the whole thing and Quaid, clearly unhinged, pulls a gun.  And keeps on describing what we all see.

So, yeah, another anthology movie with a framing story.  Two in one day!*

And it’s really, really funny.  Like, all of it.  And I think the wide range of comedy styles helps this a lot.  From gross-out to clever to obvious to overtly silly to even overwritten, it covers all bases.

It is hard to get into what makes each story good, because 1) you can’t really explain “funny,” and 2) they’re each so short that to even briefly discuss them would give too much away.  I mean, it’s not like it’s so brilliant that I’m afraid to spoil it for you, but I want to avoid the whole, “and then this part, and, oh yeah, this part, and… oh man, THIS part…” thing.**  I’m sure a string of synopses would bore you to tears.  So just see it.  And let me know if you find it funny at all.***

Yeah.  Nice “review,” Bri.  Ugh.

43

*A horror/comedy anthology day wasn’t the plan.  It just sort of happened.  “Happy accident,” as Bob Ross would say.  Were he not dead.

**I think my favorite bit was the one with Kieran Culkin and Emma Stone.  Well written, clever, with a nice bit of the human condition thrown in.  Pretty cool

***If the Hugh Jackman thing doesn’t make you laugh and cringe with delight, you’re dead inside.  This is all.