Anthology Day

Two for the road…

V/H/S/2: I reeeeeeally didn’t like V/H/S.  It was a movie that treated its premise like the thin means to an end that it was, the stories all felt too long, even though they were only like 20 minutes each, and the annoying-as-hell characters grated on me so much that I didn’t even enjoy it when they died horribly.  Then they announced V/H/S/2, and I thought, “oh, Lord, why?”  Then some buzz was coming out of it saying it managed to fix all of the issues from the first movie.  I was skeptical, at best.

Then I watched it.

No, it didn’t fix all of the issues, but it was really, really good, you guys.

Yeah, the premise is still a little silly.  I mean, again… WHY VHS TAPES?!?!?!?  This stuff still takes place in modern-day, so who’s taking digital photography and transferring it to VHS?  Now, if these stories were vintage, like happening in the early 90’s or before, it would make sense.  But since these days it’s literally easier to make a friggin’ .m4v file and throw it onto a thumb drive than to put it on a 30-year-old piece of technology, in real time, it sort of makes me mad.  Because it means they did it so they could continue to keep the V/H/S naming convention for both movies.  No deeper reason.

Also, some of the segments are mysteriously edited together in such a way that wouldn’t really be possible.  The “Safe Haven” story, in particular.  The basic premise is that a film crew has been granted permission to enter this Indonesian cult’s compound to make a documentary on them.  They have several cameras to film with, some handheld, some on tripods, and a secret spy camera embedded in a shirt button.  Needless to say, as this is a horror movie, things go supernaturally south, and it ends bloodily for everyone involved.  It’s a really good piece of storytelling, to be sure, but at one point I started thinking to myself, “wait… how are they editing this stuff together, complete with shots from the in-house security system and footage from cameras that get destroyed in all the chaos?  And who did the editing?  And why would they edit it like a horror movie?”*

OK, that said, I want to reiterate- it was an awesome story, well-shot, well-written, suspenseful, unpredictable, and scary.  As are pretty much all of the stories in this sequel.  The issue is that it’s shackled by the main premise/framing story of the movie.**  And I don’t think I’m nitpicking or thinking too much about it.  In Creepshow, it’s a kid reading a comic book and we get to see the stories come to live-action life.  That makes sense.  That worksThese movies, though, set themselves up for scrutiny by being so specific in premise for the sake of a catchy title.

Anyway, I’ve spent all this time talking about what’s wrong with V/H/S/2 when there’s so much right about it.  Although… I suppose pointing out the negative is a direct result of how good the movie is, overall.  Because in something good, it’s always that one bad thing that sticks out like a sore thumb.***  But there’s some borderline masterful horror filmmaking going on here, even if some of the stories themselves are a little basic-horror-trope-y (zombies, angry spirits, possession, aliens).  And considering the short-filminess of it all, I’m going to call it a win for everyone involved.  If you’ve got 90-minutes to build tension and pay it off in a single story, that’s one thing, but to do it for 20-30 minutes at a time, 5 times in a row, and not lose me like your predecessor did?  Bravo.

vhs2

*I’m skirting spoiler territory here, but trust me, it doesn’t matter.  What happens to everyone in the end is not half as cool as how it gets there.

**Need to say this, too- as dumb as the whole VHS premise is, the framing story this time around was really, really well done.  Creepy and scary as hell.

***Example (not the best one, but it’s the one that just popped up in my head): Poltergeist.  GREAT movie, all-around.  But that one bit where the guy peels off his face always sticks out because it looks crappy.  Does it ruin the movie?  Hells no.  But you sure do notice it when you watch…

Movie 43: Whoa.  I just went to Wikipedia for a quick refresher on Movie 43’s cast and stories (it’s been over a month since I watched it), and learned it was overwhelmingly panned by critics, and that some of the actors in it tried to get out of their contracts during filming.  I’m curious as to why.  Because I gotta say- I started it up on Netflix thinking I’d see something kind of funny that I could turn off at any time, should it suck, and instead actually laughed my ass off, many times, alone in my living room, and would have been fine if the movie had presented me with several more mini-stories.  Maybe I’m too easy, or something.

OK, let’s back up for a minute.  In case you don’t know, Movie 43 is a comedy anthology movie starring… lots of people.  From Hugh Jackman to Anna Faris to Johnny Knoxville to Kate Winslet.  I think that’s a good cross-section of the varietal casting involved here.  The directors range from Brett Ratner to James Gunn to Elizabeth Banks to Peter Farrelly.  So, it’s all over the place, talent-wise.  It’s usually compared, stylistically, to Kentucky Fried Movie, if you’ve ever seen that.  If not, maybe Amazon Women On The MoonThe Groove Tube?  No?  See those, you guys.

Anyway, yeah, comedy anthology.  The framing story stars Dennis Quaid as a crazy screenwriter who tries to pitch a movie to Greg Kinnear.  Each story is a new scene in his, “movie,” and each one makes Kinnear more certain that Quaid has lost his mind.  Eventually, Kinnear gives up on trying to be magnanimous about the whole thing and Quaid, clearly unhinged, pulls a gun.  And keeps on describing what we all see.

So, yeah, another anthology movie with a framing story.  Two in one day!*

And it’s really, really funny.  Like, all of it.  And I think the wide range of comedy styles helps this a lot.  From gross-out to clever to obvious to overtly silly to even overwritten, it covers all bases.

It is hard to get into what makes each story good, because 1) you can’t really explain “funny,” and 2) they’re each so short that to even briefly discuss them would give too much away.  I mean, it’s not like it’s so brilliant that I’m afraid to spoil it for you, but I want to avoid the whole, “and then this part, and, oh yeah, this part, and… oh man, THIS part…” thing.**  I’m sure a string of synopses would bore you to tears.  So just see it.  And let me know if you find it funny at all.***

Yeah.  Nice “review,” Bri.  Ugh.

43

*A horror/comedy anthology day wasn’t the plan.  It just sort of happened.  “Happy accident,” as Bob Ross would say.  Were he not dead.

**I think my favorite bit was the one with Kieran Culkin and Emma Stone.  Well written, clever, with a nice bit of the human condition thrown in.  Pretty cool

***If the Hugh Jackman thing doesn’t make you laugh and cringe with delight, you’re dead inside.  This is all.


Even More 2013.

More stuff I saw.  

John Dies At The End: Started reading the book, got bored, threw the movie in, got similarly bored, but was able to get through it.  It’s appropriately wacky, to be sure, but after the glorious insanity that was Bubba Ho-Tep, I was hoping for more from Don Coscarelli.  And no, I haven’t seen the Phantasm movies, so I’m not claiming to be some kind of Coscarelli devotee, expert, or even fan.  I just really dug Bubba Ho-Tep.  And Beastmaster, but that was sooooo long ago (time to revisit that one, methinks).

Anyway, I’m thinking the source material was the problem here (and “problem” is a bit strong, as John Dies isn’t necessarily a loss. Just sort of… there).  It apparently began as a webserial, published… monthly?  Weekly?  Can’t find info on that, but you get it.  And that definitely shows, as literally every chapter (that I read, anyway) ends with a big “QUESTION MARK, EXCLAMATION POINT, DOT DOT DOT” (not literally).  Which I suppose would have been kind of cool to experience in realtime, but as one cohesive unit, not so much for this reader.  And adapting that into a movie is even more awkward, as developing a through-line from a long string of chapters that end in bold punctuation (in spirit, anyway) must be a daunting task.

Not much more to say.  Again, it’s not bad.  There are some bits, mostly in the first half, that are zany, gross, and even kinda suspenseful… but for every one of those there’s an equally boring, stupid, pedestrian bit of yawnage that misses the mark.  I dunno.  Maybe I wasn’t in the mood.  Not gonna bother trying again, though.  One failed attempt at the book and one forced-finishing of the flick is enough for me.

I imagine if I were back in High School this one would live in that realm of wacky movies that my friends and I would accidentally stumble across and subsequently watch ad nauseum for their craziness, not caring that, in the long run, they might not be the best things out there.*  By, like, a country mile.

John Dies

*Stuff like THIS.  And, you know, THIS.  Also, uh, THIS.  And, of course, THIS.

.

After Earth: OK, so… I’m about to lose any and all credibility that I probably never had in the first place.  Because, dear reader, I’m going to freely and unashamedly admit something most rational human beings would catagorize as insane.

I liked After Earth.

No, I didn’t love it.  No, I don’t think it’s a particularly dynamic film.  No, I don’t forsee myself revisiting it (except for the old “flipping through channels and there it is” thing).  But like it, I did.

It has its shortfalls, no doubt.  For a movie about a kid having to survive on a future Earth where “everything has evolved to kill humans,” I thought maybe he’d face more than some angry monkeys and a leech.  I thought maybe the execution of the main storyline would involve a little more than Will Smith, Jr. hiking between freezing cold patches of land with a permanent worried look on his face.  I thought maybe the big bad would have been a more constant threat instead of a Final Boss Quicktime Event.  But I liked the aforementioned future Earth concept, I liked the (admittedly obvious) father/son stuff, and I liked the (also obvious) observations on fear*, replete with traumatic flashbacks.  Also, I liked that whole mama bird thing.

Anyway, this mini-review sucks.  I don’t know what else to say.  I took too long between watching it and writing about it, and as it’s not the most compelling thing I’ve ever seen, I’m remembering more about basic emotions I experienced than actual scenes or the filmmaking conventions therein, so I’m just gonna say, “it was good,” and move on (cop-out alert!!!).

1108146 - After Earth

*They tell me the fear stuff (and, really, most of the film’s “philosophy”) has something to do with Scientology and all its mysterious, uncomfortable quirkiness.  I know nothing about all that, so I can’t speak to its allusions in After Earth.  Sort of glad I’m ignorant to the Scientology ideology, though, as religious overtones of any kind make me at least a little uncomfortable when watching a flick.  And maybe that ignorance is part of why I enjoyed After Earth.

.

Olympus Has Fallen/White House Down: Two D.C. movies enter, one D.C. movie leaves.  And that movie is, hands-down, Olympus Has Fallen.  Because even though both have obvious origins in the original, awesome, subgenre-pioneering Die Hard, Olympus treats said origins with the utmost respect while expanding on its basic formula to match present day sensibilities.  And it treats we, the audience, like intelligent people who both know from whence it came and yet are looking for a newfound visceral experience, familiar as it may be.

White House Down, on the other hand, just takes a big, steaming, cartoon dump in the Rose Garden, points an Airtronic RPG-7 at it, yells something like, “dook THIS, asshole,” winks at the camera, pulls the trigger, and blows it up.  Then it pats itself on the back for totally one-upping Die Hard like no one else has ever one-upped Die Hard before, man.  Then it jerks off in the Oval Office and falls asleep.

And it’s funny, because, plot-wise, they’re almost identi… wait.  Did I actually write that last paragraph?  Wow.  Yeah, uh… there’s really nothing else to say after that.

WHD2

.

Thor: The Dark World: Thor was my favorite pre-Avengers Marvel joint.  Yeah, it was a little uneven when it switched from the glorious, glowing, multilevel metropolis of Asgard to the flat, dusty plains of McSouthwesttown, New Mexico… but not as uneven as the naysayers would have you believe.  And, also… wasn’t that the fucking point?!?  Take away all the pomp and circumstance so that Dudebro Douchebag Thor could become Humble Hero Thor?  WERE YOU JACKHOLES EVEN WATCHING THE FUCKING MOVIE?!?

Sorry.  This is why I have taken to mostly avoiding the movienerd websites and their talkback bandwagons.  So frustrating.

In through the nose, out through the mouth.  OK.  Let’s move on.

Thor: The Dark World goes ahead and spends most of its time out there in Sci-Fantasy land (ooh, is that a thing already?  I’m totally making that mine.  Oh, who am I kidding, I’ll forget about it by the end of this paragraph).  Dark Elves, Dark Fluids Of Mass Destruction, Dark Supersoldiers… it’s dark out in space.  Which is why the Dark Elf leader wants the Nine Realms to be perma-dark and that Rainbow Bridge to Earth and everything it stands for destroyed.  Huh.  That second thing kind of sounds like the whole anti-gay movement, actually.  Note to self: watch Thor:TDW again with this in mind.

I just can’t stay focused today.  Apologies.

Anyway, it’s like Lord Of The Rings in space.  Except shorter.  By like 10 hours.  And it’s mostly great… but never really, really great.  Even though it expands upon the best bits from its predecessor, it never quite hits the highs that that one did.  Nor does it sink to the lows (that, again, ain’t so low).  It’s fun, it’s exciting, and it drives forward at a competently speedy pace.  And, if you’re anything like me, you’ll leave feeling like you’ve seen something really well made and well worth your time.  Just maybe not as dynamic or bombastic as it could have been… which is a funny thing to say about a movie chock full of alien races, swords, and lasers.  Maybe I just need to see it again.  It is still in theaters…

Whatever.  It’s totally a worthy addition to the whole Marvel Movie Universe thing they’re doing.  My only question is… what will happen with Thor in his inevitable third movie?  I mean, after planet-jumping to fight evil techno-elves in order to save Earth, what else is there to do?  Thor vs. Godzilla?

(gotta write that one down…)

Thor2

P.S. Sci-Fantasy.

There will be more, as I saw more.  It’s hard to catch up when you’re lazy.


Spiders And Dragons And Werebears, Oh My…

Come for the Desolation, stay for the Extended Journey (you’ll see…).

The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug:  Yup.  It’s awesome.  Like Part 1’s theatrical release it has some pacing issues at the start, but they’re a little less egregious and don’t last quite as long.  The added stuff is mostly great, save one part of one new subplot (more on that later).  Smaug is totally badass.  The spiders are… bllaAATRRRGHHHstchTTTgetitoffmeGETITOFFMEguuuhhttsgggHHhhaAAaaArrrgh!!!  God, I hate spiders.

So, TH:TDOS (ugh) opens pretty much where we left off- the dwarves, having escaped the goblin town, are back to trekking east towards the lonely mountain, pursued by orcs.  Bilbo is starting to feel the true power of the ring.  Gandalf is uneasy about all the questionable goings-on in the world and goes off on his own to do some detective work.  The woodland elves are shady.  Thorin is grumpy (Bofur is Happy, Nori is Dopey…).  The humans are shifty.  And there’s a bigass dragon hibernating on a bed of gold.  So… status quo?

Yeah, you know the drill.  Fantasy realm with fantasy men fighting fantasy creatures over fantasy gold.  There’s not a whole hell of a lot more to say about the plot.  It’s the journey that’s important.  The UnexpecUgh.  I almost typed that.  Cheese, thy name is Brian.  Wait, where was I?  Oh.  Right.  The journey.  Important.  And stuff.

Really, it’s Peter Jackson’s interpretations of the major sequences from the book that are the highlight of this(these) movie(s).  Or the number one problem if you’re a party pooper purist.  Example: when the dwarves escape from the clutches of Thranduil and his merry woodelves, it’s not just barrel-riding to Dale, it’s barrel-riding while fighting pursuing orcs with an assist by Orlegolando Bloom and non-J.R.R. character Tauriel (Evangeline Costello Lilly) in a highly choreographed chase sequence.  So, a relatively simple chapter in the book about a quick escape gets a thrilling action sequence (that, for my money, was the best, most fun scene in the film).  And this is what PJax is all about with these flicks.  You can say all you want about how the book is so good and shouldn’t be fucked with and blah-blah-blah… but when there’s a movie unfolding before MY eyes, I’ll take “Thrilling Barrel-Orc-Elf-Sword-Axe-Bow-Arrow Escape” over plain old “Barrel Escape” any day.  ESPECIALLY when it’s done with such gusto.  And fun.*

But I’m an easy mark.  This is the kind of stuff that makes me feel like a kid at the movies again.

There’s more added stuff that isn’t straight-up interpretation of The Hobbit, like the Gandalf/Radagast Dol Guldur stuff (which is from the LOTR Appendices, no?  Or some other Tolkein work).  And that stuff is fine.  Maybe not as cool as the main plot, but it’s both a way to tie this story in to the Rings trilogy and to give us some more Gandalf time (seriously, dude literally disappears for several chapters.  Do you really want less McKellen?  WHAT’S WRONG WITH YOU?!?!?).  And there’s the aforementioned Tauriel character, who I thought was woven in pretty effectively, especially considering the book’s lack of strong (or, you know… any) female characters.  Besides, there’s plenty of nameless, faceless elves running around in that tome, so why not give one or two a name and a face?

And while we’re on the topic of Tauriel, I guess I should mention the one bit I didn’t love.  There’s a sort-of love triangle set up between she, Legolas (also not originally in The Hobbit), and… Kili.  Or Fili.  Whichever.  The hot dwarf.  Now, the love triangle stuff is fine- it’s awkward, it’s a little edgy, if you consider it’s basically an interracial love triangle (a stretch, to be sure, but dwarves & elves just… Don’t. Get. Along. YOU. GUYS.).  No, it’s the part where Kilifili gets an orc arrow through the thigh and a weird “he’s sick, just like Frodo was in Fellowship” tertiary plot springs up.  It’s a really clumsy and obvious callback (callforward?) to LOTR, complete with a search for the same healing plant and a Tauriel-as-Arwen glowing elf chant-magic bit.  It’s not bad, per se, just… a little forehead-slappy.  I’d say when it comes out on video I’d pull a “Cheer Up, Charlie” and hit the FF button, but… too much else happening at the same time for that (like Stephen Effing Fry as The Master Of Laketown!!!).  Also, maybe I’ll like it more in future-viewings, or in the Extended Edition, as I am wont to do.

Speaking of that… Beorn.  The first thing that happens to our merry band of bearded dudes in Desolation is the scene with everyone’s favorite werebear shapeshifter woodland hippie.  And it’s done before we even know it happened.  Which, yes, is what she said.  But also, it’s what I meant way back up there somewhere about the whole “pacing issues” thing.  And what I always say about the Extended Editions of these Middle Earth movies (see below…).  Clearly Petey Jackson was told to keep it under 3 hours, so I think stuff like the Beorn sequence is his way of keeping everyone’s favorite scenes in the flick (he can ill-afford another Tom Bombadil), albeit seriously truncated.  Which, again, fucks with the pacing.  Anyway, I could be wrong.  Maybe Beorn won’t get more screen time come next holiday shopping season.  But I’ll bet he will.

So… yeah.  The Hobbit: The Desolation Of That Dragon I Mentioned In Passing Seven Paragraphs Ago But Didn’t Even Talk About Even Though His Name’s In The Title (voiced by Benny Cumberbatch!  AWESOME!).  Get out there and see it.  I saw it in HFR 3D IMAX.  I’d say if you have a choice, skip the HFR (they improved on it, slightly, but it’s still reeeeeeeally funky to look at), do 3D if that’s your thing (it surely ain’t mine… although the one thing HFR did was improve the 3D.  A little.), and the IMAX, also not usually my thing, was well worth it here.  Whatever.  Just go see it.

Smauglock

*Another obviously extended sequence?  Smaug.  That dragon I didn’t talk about.  There’s a whole “dwarves-running-away-and-trying-to-defeat-him” thing that happens, and it’s pretty elaborate.  And totally made up by the filmmakers.  But, seriously, the alternative was to do it just like the book and have him introduced, only to immediately leave, fly to Lake Town, and, off-camera, get ki… er… uh… I mean… have a tea party (phew!  Almost spoiled that 76-year-old story for you!  Close one!).  And that, friends, would have left you feeling pretty cheated.

.

Oh, and hey, while we’re here- I wrote the following like a month ago, so… BONUS!!!

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Extended Edition: These are some of the negative things I said in my (mostly positive, mind you) review of the theatrical release of The Hobbit: AUJ last year-

“The first hour or so of the movie has some serious pacing issues and feels a bit bloated…”

“…the movie starts… then kinda lays there, like it hit the snooze button, or something…”

“…we’re treated to an unnecessary scene where old Bilbo and young Frodo discuss the upcoming party from The Fellowship Of The Ring [that] kills the momentum, five minutes in….”

“…The Hobbit has it’s own nice, juicy story, and adding in these [other storyline] elements to tie it in to what we’ve already seen is not only unnecessary, it’s almost Lucas-level OCD…”

Yee-IKES.

BUT, in my defense, I also said this:

“…maybe the pacing issues can be fixed with whatever else is getting added in the [Extended Edition Blu-Ray].”

God, I love it when I’m right.*

I almost feel like I should just skip printing my thoughts on the theatrical releases of the next two parts of The Hobbit.**  I mean, the exact same thing that happened with literally each film in the Lord Of The Rings trilogy has happened with An Unexpected Journey– Peter Jackson took a long, somewhat awkwardly paced movie and made it flow more naturally by ADDING TO THE RUNTIME.***  In this movie’s case it’s only 13 minutes (as opposed to the 30, 44, and 49 extra minutes on the three LOTRs, respectively), but those 13 minutes were the key to fixing literally everything I felt iffy about, initially.  That includes the non-J.R.R. scenes and the ones from his other works.  It also includes all the scenes that were not augmented.  It’s proof to me that pacing is everything, an adaptation shouldn’t be shackled by its source material, and that a movie should be exactly as long as it needs to be.

In any case, if you’ve seen An Unexpected Journey, you’ve formed your own opinion about it.  If that opinion is a negative one, then I weep for you nothing I say will change your mind about it.  But I hope you’ll consider checking out this extended version anyway.  Picture it like this: when you catch a movie you love on network/basic cable TV it’s usually a negative experience, as it’s been edited down for runtime, cuss words, commercial breaks, etc., and it leaves you feeling frustrated, because you know how much better it is in its original form.  Think of this Extended Edition of An Unexpected Journey as the “original form” and give it another go.  You might just be surprised.

If your AUJ opinion is a positive one already, just think of the EE as having your second breakfast and eating it, too.

bilbo__index

*I still think the theatrical version could have been about 20 minutes shorter.  If all of the LOTR-heavy stoylines, Frodo/old Bilbo stuff, and Bag End dwarf shenanigans were saved for the Extended Edition the movie would have turned less people off, and theaters could have fit in more viewings per day.  Everybody wins.  Whatever- it’s a moot point now.

**The liklihood of me actualy skipping said printed thoughts can be filed under “yeah, right.”  [EDIT, 12/15/13: Theory, proven.  See above]

***Some added bits (printed down here in case you don’t want to know ahead of time): 

1. More Hobbiton stuff, such as child-Bilbo meeting Gandalf for the first time (swinging a child-sword, thus simultaneously going against acceptable Hobbit behavior and catching The Grey’s wise eye), and present-day Bilbo interacting with some Hobbits in town, paranoid about his encounter with present-day Gandalf.

2. All sorts of Rivendell stuff, such as a dinner scene that highlights the, uh… etiquettal, culinary, and musical differences between dwarves and elves, a bit about why Gandalf cares about the dwarves taking back the mountain (putting to rest some life-long suspicions I had about this), and a nice bit where Bilbo, clearly in love with the place, is invited by Elrond to stay, should he so desire.

3. Some Goblin Town shenanigans, most notably the Goblin King’s song, in which we get both an extended tonal introduction to their underground society and more time with that awesomely gross warty nutsack he calls a chin.

There are more little bits added here and there, but these were the most obvious, full-scene additions.